Least specific check for full css3 selector support is .selector:not(browser\\hack)
.
A part of me wishes .selector:not(*:not(*))
worked; but – the horror, the horror – I’ve seen that selector in ‘nam.
Least specific check for full css3 selector support is .selector:not(browser\\hack)
.
A part of me wishes .selector:not(*:not(*))
worked; but – the horror, the horror – I’ve seen that selector in ‘nam.
Working out supplies for a large group’s weekend away raises odd questions. Am I greedy or a light eater, is one.
I’ve checked, @maddisondesigns, I’m still right about !important. ?
@pwcc Haha. I’ll check back with you in a couple years then to see if I can say “I told you so!”
— Anthony Hortin 🇺🇦 (@maddisondesigns) August 24, 2013
It’s the last minute! Write a @webdirections proposal http://www.webdirections.org/wd15/cfp.html
(Having second thoughts on sitting this on out, tbh)
Now on WordPress.TV, Wednesday’s #wpmelb dev meetup: I’m an imposter because…
From the archives (2010): JavaScript the WordPress way. https://peterwilson.cc/javascript-the-wordpress-way-part-1/
Comment spam: It seems like Movable Type is the top blogging platform available.
@akismet has created a mod queue & labeled it bullshit.
Let’s gamify database schemas.